Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 F.2d 1313 - United States v. Lefkowitz

United States v. Lefkowitz’s Empirical Analysis

618 F.2d 1313 · 1980

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
10
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

71 federal appellate · 6 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably State v. Perez (2009), United States v. Williams (1984)

71 federal appellate · 6 district · 11 state decisions — followed in 10 states

7001980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Franks v. Delaware · Aguilar v. Texas · Rakas v. Illinois · Johnson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the affidavit contains intentionally or recklessly false statements'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “affidavits marred by omissions of facts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “... Certain aspects of the information were independently corroborated by information already known to the [government].... The information was given to the [government] in circumstances subjecting the informants to possible personal or penal risk.... In addition, [the informants'] stories corroborated each other. 38 618 F.2d at 1316 (citations omitted) (emphasis added); see also United States v. Prueitt, supra, 540 F.2d at 1005 (factors from which reliability can be verified include”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.