Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 F.2d 607 - United States v. Sheker

United States v. Sheker’s Empirical Analysis

618 F.2d 607 · 1980

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2016

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

1101980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 912

Relies on Bell v. United States · Eisenstadt v. Baker · O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden · United States v. Grayson · Kennedy v. Powell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For instance, state secrets might trade hands without cash consideration. Information obtained for political advantage might have value apart from its worth in dollars. In each case the information sought would have value to others, in addition to the seeker.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.