United States v. Carnes’s Empirical Analysis
618 F.2d 68 · 1980
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2000 · most notably United States v. Nelson (1983), United States v. Mehrmanesh (1980)
28 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Burks v. United States · Abney v. United States · Crist v. Bretz · Di Bella v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his could not properly raise double jeopardy as a ground. A retrial after a jury disagreement does not normally give rise to a double jeopardy claim, [citations]. Unless the trial judge has abused his discretion in declaring the mistrial, a mistrial because of inability to reach a verdict will not bar a second trial. 618 F.2d at 69-70 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“all final decisions of the district courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.