Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 F.2d 686 - Thornton v. Coffey

Thornton v. Coffey’s Empirical Analysis

618 F.2d 686 · 1980

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
September 2008
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 2008 · most notably Burrus v. United Telephone Co. of Kansas, Inc. (1982), Jones v. New York State Division of Military & Naval Affairs (1999)

24 federal appellate · 8 district ·

300198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 32 U.S.C. § 709 (National Guard Technicians Act of 1968) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters · Orloff v. Willoughby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may offer a convenient pretext for giving force and effect to racial prejudice,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We have held that findings are not to be determined clearly erroneous unless, after a review of the entire record, we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is beyond argument that a rating procedure used by an historically segregated employer which favors applicants already employed full-time falls squarely within the prohibition of Griggs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.