Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 F.2d 771 - Berges v. Gottstein

Berges v. Gottstein’s Empirical Analysis

618 F.2d 771 · 1980

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
September 2008
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2008 · most notably Cooper v. Goldfarb (1998), Sandt Technology Ltd v. Resco Metal and Plastics Corporation Seven Ocean Enterprises Inc (2001)

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

110198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berry v. Webb · Senkus v. Johnston · Mikus v. Wachtel · Patterson v. Clements · Patterson v. Clements

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “considering the field of investigation, we see no other substantial use for these compounds at that time except the research team's stated general objective.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[E]ach corroboration case must be decided on its own facts with a view to deciding whether the evidence as a whole is persuasive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “With all of the documentation briefly reviewed above, which consistently fits the affidavit evidence and planned activities of the members of the research team directed toward synthesis of T-ceph-A, we hold the production of T-ceph-A as and when asserted by Berges to be established by more than a preponderance of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.