City of New Haven, Connecticut v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Allegheny Airlines, Inc., Intervenors’s Empirical Analysis
618 F.2d 955 · 1980
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Morgan · House v. Stynchcombe · Montrose Chemical Corporation of California v. Russell E. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Montrose Chemical Corporation of California v. Russell E. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency · Securities & Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System · Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Train
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“scheduled air transportation of persons to a point provided under such criteria as the Board determines satisfies the needs of the community concerned for air transportation to one or more communities of interest and insures access to the Nation’s air transportation system, at rates, fares, and charges which are not unjust, unreasonable, unjustly discriminatory, unduly preferential, or unduly prejudicial, and— (1) with respect to air transportation to any point (other than in the State of Alaska), in no case shall essential air transportation be specified as fewer than two daily round trips, 5 days per week, or the level of service provided by air carriers to such point based on the schedules of such air carriers in effect for calendar year 1977, whichever is less .... 18”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“No air carrier holding a certificate issued under this section shall— (A) terminate or suspend all air transportation which it is providing to a point under such certificate; or (B) reduce any such air transportation below that which the Board has determined to be essential air transportation for such point; unless such air carrier has first given the Board, any community affected, and the State agency of the State in which such community is located, at least 90 days notice of its intent to so terminate, suspend, or reduce such air transportation. The Board may, by regulation or otherwise, authorize such temporary suspension of service as may be in the public interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to encourage, develop, and attain an air transportation system which relies on competitive market forces to determine the quality, variety, and price of air services * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.