Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 FSUPP 1534 - In Re Scott County Master Docket

In Re Scott County Master Docket’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 9 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 671 (§ 471 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Carroll v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The determination of whether a prosecutor's actions were prosecutorial or investigatory sometimes requires a limited factual inquiry. Of course, permitting a factual inquiry on the issue of whether actions were prosecutorial or investigatory dilutes somewhat the protection of prosecutorial immunity, but this dilution may be necessary in some cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[Gjovernment officials performing discretionary functions, generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This warning is part of the Government Data Practices Act, Minn.Stat. Secs. 13.01-.88, and it requires social workers to, inter alia, inform interviewees whether they may refuse to answer questions and why information is being sought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.