Arthur v. Nyquist’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Roberts · George Arthur v. Ewald P. Nyquist · 415 F. Supp. 904 - Arthur v. Nyquist · Arthur v. Nyquist · 609 F. Supp. 1491 - Keyes v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, DENVER, COLO.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[sjhould a dispute of this nature recur, we think it will normally be helpful if those who seek a court order for additional funding, and those who oppose such an order, supply the District Court with considerable detail reflecting the proposed expenditures in the absence of the additional funds claimed to be needed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.