Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 N.W.2d 337 - State v. Calhoun

State v. Calhoun’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hubsch v. United States · State v. Brooks · State v. Meeks · 75 N.J. Super. 283 - State v. Berko · 2000 WI App 155 - State v. Czarnecki

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. A person is guilty of forgery if, with the intent to defraud or injure anyone, or with knowledge that the person is facilitating a fraud or injury to be perpetrated by anyone, the person does any of the following: [[Image here]] b. Makes, completes, executes, authenticates, issues, or transfers a writing so that it purports to be the act of another who did not authorize that act, or so that it purports to have been executed at a time or place or in a numbered sequence other than was in fact the case, or so that it purports to be a copy of an original when no such original existed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.