State v. Calhoun’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hubsch v. United States · State v. Brooks · State v. Meeks · 75 N.J. Super. 283 - State v. Berko · 2000 WI App 155 - State v. Czarnecki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. A person is guilty of forgery if, with the intent to defraud or injure anyone, or with knowledge that the person is facilitating a fraud or injury to be perpetrated by anyone, the person does any of the following: [[Image here]] b. Makes, completes, executes, authenticates, issues, or transfers a writing so that it purports to be the act of another who did not authorize that act, or so that it purports to have been executed at a time or place or in a numbered sequence other than was in fact the case, or so that it purports to be a copy of an original when no such original existed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Acevedo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.