Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 P2D 127 - Mayer v. State

Mayer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably Hopkinson v. State (1981), Wilks v. State (2002)

29 state decisions

1401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Gault · Berger v. United States · Mincey v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * An examination of the cases cited by appellant in support of his argument reflects the circumstances in each are far more aggravated and severe than those in this case. The trial court relied upon the factual situation as presented to it by the evidence, and it considered the totality of the circumstances surrounding the transaction. Such evidence is gauged against such standard supports the findings of the trial court. [Citations.]" Id. at 130.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “was seventeen years of age, intoxicated, was suffering from physical injuries incurred from a severe beating, was emotionally overwrought and had been deprived of the counsel of his mother.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Generally the question of admission of photographs is left to the reasonable discretion of the trial court. However, in any case of which we are aware in which a photograph was deemed properly admitted it had some probative value. This principle would seem to be applicable to the admission of any exhibit, for if that which is offered has no probative value there would appear to be no reason for its admission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.