Cunningham v. Gibson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 559 So. 2d 557 - Fries Correctional Equip., Inc. v. Con-Tech, Inc. · 567 So. 2d 1276 - Hannah v. Blackwell · 579 So. 2d 605 - Storage Equities, Inc. v. Kidd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Because Kirtland does not specifically state which party has the burden of proof relating to the second factor of the test established in Kirtland , we now take the opportunity to set out the principle of law that trial courts must apply in determining whether a plaintiff will be unfairly prejudiced if a default judgment is set aside. We hold that when a party files a motion to set aside a default judgment, the movant has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing that the plaintiff will not be unfairly prejudiced if the default judgment is set aside. If the movant makes a prima facie showing that the plaintiff will not be unfairly prejudiced, the burden then shifts to the plaintiff to present facts showing that the plaintiff will be unfairly prejudiced if the default judgment is set aside. Here, [the defaulting party] made no showing that [the plaintiff] would not be unfairly prejudiced if the default judgment was set aside. Consequently, we hold that the trial judge, in applying the second prong of the Kirtland test, did not err in denying [the defaulting party's] motion to set aside the default judgment."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[M]ere delay or increased cost is not sufficient to justify a refusal to set aside a default judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.