618 So. 2d 205
618 So.2d 205
18 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 305
Decided May 20, 1993
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1993-05-20
Relies on 602 So. 2d 914 - Florida Bar re: Advisory Opinion · 597 So. 2d 309 - King v. State · 616 So. 2d 31 - The Florida Bar v. Neckman
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1993-05-20
Cited by 93 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2015 · most notably 655 So. 2d 111 - Reyes v. State (1995), 629 So. 2d 841 - Brown v. State (1994)
1 district · 88 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We review Joyner v. State, 594 So.2d 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), on the ground of express and direct conflict under article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.
¶2Based on this Court’s adoption in McKnight v. State, 616 So.2d 31 (Fla.1993), of the rationale expressed in King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 602 So.2d 942 (Fla.1992), the decision of the district court of appeal in the instant case is approved.
¶3It is so ordered.