618 So. 2d 337 - DeHaven v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2016
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lee · Commonwealth v. McNeil · State v. Robinson · State v. Henderson · 266 So. 2d 661 - State v. Matera
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o grant relief in this case would permit [the defendant] to reap a windfall new trial on account of his own [crime]. We cannot allow this tempting gambit for counsel and client. In the circumstances alleged by [the defendant], [the defendant] must remain responsible for his own misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Mere suspicion or inconsistent statements by the defendant alone are insufficient to establish that the defendant's testimony would have been false.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“hapless defendant ... deceived by an overzealous or unscrupulous advocate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.