Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 SO2D 375 - Wintter v. Fabber

Wintter v. Fabber’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2018

9 state decisions

50199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Equipment Rental Ltd. v. Mercury Typesetting Company, and Third Party v. Statmaster Corporation, Third Party Edmund H. H. Caddy v. Statmaster Corporation, Statmaster Corporation v. Walter J. Bruchhausen, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York · Bulk Oil Transports, Inc. v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. · In re San Juan Gold, Inc. · Pomerantz v. Schandler · 574 So. 2d 325 - Bonfiglio v. Hampton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he right to retain the papers is valuable to the attorney in proportion as denial of access to them causes inconvenience to the client. Where the client or someone representing him has a pressing necessity for them, the court will order them delivered up upon condition that the fee be paid or security given for such sum as may be found to be due .... The attorney’s lien cannot be disregarded merely because the pressure it is supposed to exert becomes effective.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the erstwhile client is entitled to delivery of his papers or other property subject to the lien only if he pays the amount due or secures the payment thereof. To do otherwise, as the jurisprudence points out, nullifies the effect and purpose of the lien.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.