Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 So. 2d 923 - State v. Wisinger

618 So. 2d 923 - State v. Wisinger’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2016

10 state decisions

70199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A. Second degree murder is the killing of a human being: (1) When the offender has a specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A convicted defendant who claims error because of his trial counsel's ineffectiveness must establish two separate elements in order to succeed: First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient. This requires showing that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the "counsel" guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment. Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This requires showing that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.