Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 SW2D 135 - Guetersloh Grain, Inc. v. Wright

Guetersloh Grain, Inc. v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Allred v. Lowry · Guillen v. Claybrook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We recognize that the Rule may create scheduling problems for a busy trial court. However, the Rule is drawn by the Supreme Court in mandatory terms and does not give the trial court any discretion in the matter; if the court does not rule on the contest within ten days after the contest is filed, the allegations of the affidavit must be taken as true.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Thus under Rule 355(e) the trial court was required to rule on the contests within ten days or accept the allegations of the affidavit as true. It did neither. Therefore, the order sustaining the contest of the affidavit is a nullity and Relator is entitled to mandamus relief in this court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.