Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 SW2D 647 - State v. Oldham

State v. Oldham’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Edwards v. Arizona · Brewer v. Williams · Michigan v. Mosley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not subject to further interrogation by the authorities until counsel has been made available to him, unless the accused himself initiates further communication, exchanges or conversations with the police.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) Did the accused, after having expressed a desire for assistance of counsel, initiate further communication? (2) If the answer to one is `yes' did the accused do so voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Resolution by this Court of the issue presented has been simplified by the guidance now found in the very recent case of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 [ 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 ] (1981), which was not available to the trial judge, the parties at time of submission nor the Western District at time of transfer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.