Johnson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
619 F.2d 366 · 1980
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably United States v. Jefferson (1983), United States v. Henry (1983)
37 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2106
Relies on Mempa v. Rhay · Heflin v. United States · Prince v. United States · Simpson v. United States · Busic v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The conviction of appellant under the above statutes based on a single transaction of bank robbery with a firearm violates the Double Jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment; (2) Appellant did not receive effective assistance of counsel at trial; (3) Improper jury charges which prejudiced appellant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the proper procedure is not to vacate the convictions, but only the sentences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“District Court should at least be able to reconsider”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.