Parsons Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs’s Empirical Analysis
619 F.2d 38 · 1980
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2010 · most notably Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich Collieries (1994), Bumble Bee Seafoods v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (1980)
39 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Town of Mashpee v. Mashpee Tribe · O'Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc. · Del Vecchio v. Bowers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. Director Office of Workers' Compensation Programs United States Department of Labor · Ruth Grijalva v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs National Steel & Shipbuilding Co., National Steel & Shipbulding Company v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Ruth Grijalva“must be specific and comprehensive enough to sever the potential connection”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““In any proceeding for the enforcement of a claim for compensation under this chapter it shall be presumed, in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary— (a) That the claim comes within the provisions of this chapter.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.