Warncke v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
619 F.2d 412 · 1980
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably Bloodsworth v. Heckler (1983), Oldham v. Schweiker (1981)
23 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Landess v. Weinberger · Johnson v. Harris · Strickland v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so brief and conclusory that it lack(ed) strong persuasive weight.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]his is not a case in which the ALJ and reviewing physician reached a decision contrary to the uncontroverted medical testimony, or unsupported by other adequate acceptable evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We accord little weight to the opinion of a reviewing physician if it is contrary to the opinion of the only physician to examine the patient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Spencer v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.