Rose v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis
619 F.2d 42 · 1980
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2009
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Jones v. Cunningham · Frontiero v. Richardson · Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] detainer in the form of a communication from the Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles requesting that it be notified before Rose was to be released from federal custody so that it could retake Rose and require him to begin serving the balance of his sentences, is sufficient 'custody' to allow a habeas corpus action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vargas v. Swan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.