Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 619 F.2d 67 - In re Fitzgerald

In re Fitzgerald’s Empirical Analysis

619 F.2d 67 · 1980

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
October 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 103

Relies on In re Swinehart · In re Brown · In re Best · In re Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to prove that the prior art products do not necessarily or inherently possess the characteristics of his claimed product.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.