Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 619 F.2d 871 - Hardage v. Atkins

Hardage v. Atkins’s Empirical Analysis

619 F.2d 871 · 1980

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
February 2004
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2004

5 federal appellate ·

40198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey · Dean Milk Co. v. City of Madison · Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cottrell · Hardage v. Atkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantially similar standards for controlled industrial waste disposal as those which Oklahoma ha[d] enacted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in requiring that hazardous industrial wastes brought into the state of Oklahoma are disposed of in accordance with its standards of health and safety. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cottrell, supra; Dean Milk Co. v. Madison, 340 U.S. 349, 354 , 71 S.Ct. 295, 297 , 95 L.Ed. 329 (1951). But has Oklahoma chosen a means to achieve this goal which is in harmony with the Commerce Clause of the Constitution? Appellants maintain that the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “requirement is much less exacting than the requirement that the states have a reciprocity agreement. They argue that merely to require that both states have standards which are substantially the same is less difficult to administer and imposes a requirement which is less burdensome than the requirement that there be reciprocity agreements that with the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.