Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 619 F.3d 963 - Jones v. Astrue

Jones v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

619 F.3d 963 · 2010

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
August 2021
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Polaski v. Heckler · Polaski v. Heckler · Goff v. Barnhart · Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The GAF is a numeric scale ranging from zero to one hundred used to rate social, occupational and psychological functioning "on a hypothetical continuum of mental health-illness.” Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 32 (4th ed. Am. Psychiatric Ass'n 1994) (DSM-IV).... A GAF of 41 to 50 indicates the individual has "[sjerious symptoms ... or any serious impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning....” DSM-IV at 32. A GAF of 51 to 60 indicates the individual has "[m]oderate symptoms ... or moderate difficulty in social, occupational, or school functioning ...” DSM-IV at 32.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In reviewing the ALJ's decision, we examine whether it is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole and whether the ALJ made any legal errors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.