Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 619 P2D 720 - Danks v. State

Danks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
8
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2024

19 state decisions

12019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gryger v. Burke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he fact that one of the convictions that entered into the [defendant’s sentencing] calculations ... occurred before the Act was passed [does not make] the Act invalidly retroactive[.] The [defendant’s] sentence as a [repeat] offender or habitual criminal is not to be viewed as either a new jeopardy or [an] additional penalty for the earlier crimes. It is a stiffened penalty for the latest crime, which is considered to be an aggravated offense because [it is] a repetitive one.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Court suspensions, revocations, and limitations. (a) The following are grounds for the immediate suspension or revocation of a driver’s license: (5) driving or operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or another drug; (b) A court convicting a person of an offense under (a)(1) — (7) of this section shall revoke that person’s driver’s license for a period of not less than 30 days for the first conviction, unless the court determines that the person’s ability to earn a livelihood would be severely impaired and a limitation under § 201 of this chapter can be placed on the license which will enable the person to earn a livelihood without excessive risk or danger to the public. If a court limits a person’s license under this subsection, it shall do so for a period of not less than 30 days. Upon a subsequent conviction of a person for any offense under (a) of this section, the court shall revoke the person’s license and may not grant him any limited license privileges for the following periods: (1) not less than one year for the second conviction; and (2) not less than three years for a third or subsequent conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is dispositive of any claim based on the federal constitution, and we see no reason for us to interpret Alaska's constitutional provision differently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.