In Re TRP’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 158 N.C. App. 441 - In Re McKinney · 67 N.C. App. 501 - Matter of Green · 109 N.C. App. 285 - Matter of Triscari Children · Pulley v. Pulley · 126 N.C. App. 432 - Matter of Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]s there is no evidence in the record suggesting later filings sufficient to invoke jurisdiction as to the review order, the trial court erred in proceeding on the matter due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the Petition was neither signed nor verified by the director or an authorized representative of the director.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n any case where custody is removed from a parent, guardian, custodian, or caretaker.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re TRP
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.