Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 619 SO2D 1076 - State v. Tucker

State v. Tucker’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Arizona v. Fulminante · Lockhart v. Nelson · Yates v. Evatt · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the entirety of the evidence, including inadmissible evidence which was erro neously admitted, is insufficient to support the conviction, the accused must be discharged.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “were clearly hearsay and were thus inadmissible”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.