Miller v. One Shell Square’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 486 So. 2d 717 - Hebert v. Doctors Memorial Hosp. · 611 So. 2d 1383 - Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NO · 440 So. 2d 93 - Louviere v. Shell Oil Co. · Duplechain v. Clausing MacHine Tools · 553 So. 2d 1034 - Gravois v. New England Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An interruption of prescription resulting from the filing of a suit in a competent court and in the proper venue or from service of process within the prescriptive period continues as long as the suit is pending. Interruption is considered never to have occurred if the plaintiff abandons, voluntarily dismisses, or fails to prosecute the suit to trial. [2]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.