Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

619 So. 2d 307

State v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-03-10

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1994

2 state decisions

Relies on 609 So. 2d 613 - State v. Rochelle · State v. Nevadomski

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-03-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Having accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160, this court reverses the suppression order that was presented in this appeal for review, and remands the case to the trial court. See State v. Rochelle, 609 So.2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

¶2ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

¶3We grant the motion and certify as questions of great public importance those certified in State v. Nevadomski, 619 So.2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

¶4GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.

¶5HERSEY, J., dissents without opinion.

/619/so2d/307 · .json · Public domain