Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 619 So. 2d 952 - Green v. State

619 So. 2d 952 - Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Ex Parte Cole (2002), 675 So. 2d 532 - Long v. State (1996)

29 state decisions

180199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 529 So. 2d 1074 - Ross v. State · 40 Ala. App. 306 - Crews v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Johnny Kenneth Green was indicted for the offense of burglary in the first degree. With the appellant's consent, the indictment was amended to charge the offense of receiving stolen property in the second degree. The appellant pleaded guilty to this offense. "The State has filed a motion to remand this cause to the trial court, arguing that an indictment cannot be amended to charge an offense that is not a lesser included offense of the crime charged in the indictment. The State's motion is well taken. The offense of receiving stolen property is not a lesser included offense of burglary. Crews v. State , 40 Ala. App. 306 , 112 So.2d 805 (1959). The indictment, therefore, was improperly amended. See Rule 13.5(a), A. R. Crim. P. The appellant could not consent to an improper amendment. Ross v. State , 529 So.2d 1074 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988). The conviction for receiving stolen property must be set aside."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.