Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 619 SW2D 279 - Ex Parte Englutt

Ex Parte Englutt’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 1996
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Menna v. New York · Yates v. United States · Ex Parte Rohleder · Ex Parte Allison · Ex Parte Ramzy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. lacks sufficient personal or real property which could be sold or mortgaged to raise the needed sum; and 2. has unsuccessfully attempted to borrow the sum from financial institutions such as banks, credit unions, and loan companies; and 3. knows of no other source, including relatives, from whom the sum could be borrowed or otherwise secured.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “era of enlightened constitutional interpretation and expanded constitutional protections,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.