Davis v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2019
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · United Pipeline Construction Co. v. Kaelin · Cox v. Rueff Lighting Co. · Cabe v. Dudgeon · Jones v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(d) A person’s employment is principally localized in this ... state when: 1. His employer has a place of business in this ... state and he regularly works at or from such place of business, or 2. If subparagraph 1. foregoing is not applicable, he is domiciled and spends a substantial part of his working time in the service of his employer in this ... state....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“hiring and working [plaintiff] in Kentucky were transactions of business in Kentucky”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.