Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 619 SW2D 830 - State v. Meeks

State v. Meeks’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2002
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thummel v. King · Tatum v. United States · State v. Johnson · United States v. Alston · Hall v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not intend to characterize the defendant's case for mental disease or defect as either strong or weak, but it is more than a scintilla. We might believe that the defendant's witnesses were of dubious veracity, or we might believe that their testimony was not plausible— or accepting their testimony as true, we might believe it does not show mental disease or defect excluding responsibility. But that is not our judgment to make. That is a judgment for the jury to make, and it was the trial court's duty to submit the issue to the jury upon proper instructions,....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.