Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 ALA 129 - Lehman v. Lewis

Lehman v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1878

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
12
states following
August 1962
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently August 1962 · most notably Lauderdale v. Peace Baptist Church (1944), Montgomery v. McNutt (1926)

59 state decisions — followed in 12 states

1201878188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Howland v. Blake · Botsford v. Burr · Boyd v. Dunlap · Page v. Page · Tilford v. Torrey & Lockwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a man employs another person by parol, as an agent, to buy an estate for him, and the latter buys it accordingly in his own name, and no part of the purchase-money is paid by the principal, then, if the agent denies the trust, and there is no written agreement or document establishing it, he cannot, by a suit in equity, compel the agent to convey the estate to him; for (as has been said) that would be decidedly in the teeth of the statute of frauds.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The verbal declarations or admissions of the grantee, in whom the legal estate resides, are admissible as evidence against him, and all claiming under him otherwise than as bona fide purchasers for value. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.