Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 ALA 358 - Causler v. Wharton

Causler v. Wharton’s Empirical Analysis

1878

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
November 1973
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 1973

14 state decisions

6018781880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bradford v. Spyker's Adm'r · Tisdale v. Maxwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Neither writing, nor any other particular form need be observed in the formation of a trading or laboring partnership. Mutual consent of two or more competent minds can make this, as it can make other contracts. And, like most other contracts, it may be implied from conduct and circumstances, if significant and expressive enough to convince the mind.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.