In Re Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 327 · 11 U.S.C. § 328 · 11 U.S.C. § 364 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on In Re Roberts · Yermakov v. Fitzsimmons · In Re Heatron, Inc. · Mann v. McCombs · Barton v. Chrysler (In Re Paine)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appropriate in this instance to defer to the expertise of the Bankruptcy Court in determining the severity”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Martin Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.