In Re Hubbard’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 305 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 311 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably 17 Cal. 3d 129 - Birkenfeld v. City of Berkeley (1976), 37 Cal. 3d 644 - Fisher v. City of Berkeley (1984)
3 federal appellate · 305 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 60 Cal. 2d 276 - Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles · 49 Cal. 2d 409 - People v. McCaughan · In Re Lane · In Re Newbern · 20 Cal. 2d 366 - Pipoly v. Benson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 311 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The subject matter has been so fully and completely covered by general law as to clearly indicate that it has become exclusively a matter of state concern; (2) the subject matter has been partially covered by general law couched in such terms as to indicate clearly that a paramount state concern will not tolerate further or additional local action; or (3) the subject matter has been partially covered by general law and the subject is of such a nature that the adverse effect of a local ordinance on the transient citizens of the state outweighs the possible benefit to the municipality.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he general law consists of a series of prohibitory enactments covering many aspects of gambling. Do those many statutes constitute a full occupation of the entire subject matter of gambling, in its varied forms? Or is the “field” which we are asked to find preempted by the state limited to the subject of “gaming”; ... A third possibility is that the field should be defined in such a manner as to be limited to participation in “banking or percentage” games.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Any county or incorporated city or town may make and enforce, within its limits, all such local police, sanitary and other regulations as are not in conflict with its charter or with the general laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Caesar v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.