Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 CAL2D 325 - In Re Johnson

In Re Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

457
cited by 457 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
14
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 437 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 457 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably 67 Cal. 2d 365 - People v. Lara (1967), 1 Cal. 3d 694 - People v. Floyd (1970)

8 federal appellate · 437 state decisions — followed in 14 states

2010196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · Carnley v. Cochran · Moore v. State of Michigan · Rice v. Olson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 457 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[T]he court cannot accept a waiver of counsel from anyone accused of a serious public offense without first determining that he”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A waiver is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege. The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to Counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The Court: I hand you a copy of the indictment, Mr. Fresquez. You are entitled to the benefit of legal counsel at all stages of the proceedings. Do you want an attorney ? “The Defendant : I can't afford one—no, I can’t afford one at all, no. “The Court: If you want one I would have to appoint one for you. “TheDefendant: No, I don’t. “The Court: You don’t want one? ‘ ‘ The Defendant : No. “The Court: All right. Are you prepared to enter a plea to the charges at this time? ‘ ‘ The Defendant -. Yes. ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.