Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 CAL2D 547 - In re Shipp

In re Shipp’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

167
cited by 167 later decisions
5
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 139 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 167 later decisions — most recently December 2009 · most notably 3 Cal. 3d 100 - In Re Antazo (1970), 63 Cal. 2d 400 - In Re Spencer (1965)

9 federal appellate · 139 state decisions

103019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · Fay v. Noia · Sanders v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 167 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have consistently held that an issue which is raised in the trial court, and upon which conflicting testimony develops, cannot serve as a basis for habeas corpus; we cannot sanction piecemeal presentation or split adjudication of such issues. ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “habeas corpus cannot serve as a substitute for appeal, and, in the absence of special circumstances constituting an excuse for failure to employ that remedy, the writ will not lie where the claimed errors could have been, but were not, raised upon a timely appeal from a judgment of conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “We recognize, however, the desirability of the maximum integration of such process in order to avoid the possibility of wasteful duplication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.