Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 Conn. App. 332 - Feuerman v. Feuerman

62 Conn. App. 332 - Feuerman v. Feuerman’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2001
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Amodio v. Amodio · State v. Hamilton · Joe's Pizza, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. · State v. Copeland · State v. Angell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well established that, in determining whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction, every presumption favoring jurisdiction should be indulged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.