Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 CONNAPP 727 - Melo v. Spencer

Melo v. Spencer’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ardoline v. Keegan · Munson v. Atwood · Chieffalo v. Norden Systems, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court has the `inherent power to set aside a verdict where it finds it has made, in its . . . rulings on evidence. . . . a palpable error which was harmful to the proper disposition of the case and probably brought about a different result in the verdict.' Munson v. Atwood , 108 Conn. 285 , 288 , 142 A. 737 (1928). `It is proper for a trial court, using due caution, and in the exercise of its discretion, to set aside a verdict' when satisfied that . . . its rulings on evidence were erroneous and that those erroneous . . . rulings were consequential enough to have had a substantial effect on the verdict' Ardoline v. Keegan , 140 Conn. 552 , 555-56 , 102 A.2d 352 (1954)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.