Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 CUSTCT 79 - J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 1970
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Colomby Watch Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “two or more parts or pieces of metal or other material joined or fastened together,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “consisting of two * * * parts or pieces of metal joined or fastened together”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “within the literal meaning of the language contained in”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.