Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 F.1d 126 - In re Saito

In re Saito’s Empirical Analysis

62 F. 126 · 1894

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 1925
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1925

1 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions

701894190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fong Yue Ting v. United States · Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Taggart · Elk v. Wilkins · In re Camille

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The provisions of this title shall apply to aliens being free white persons and to aliens of African nativity and to persons of African descent.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.