Thom v. Pittard’s Empirical Analysis
62 F. 232 · 1894
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1925
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Baltimore Co v. Baugh · Randall v. Baltimore O R · MINNEAPOLIS AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. Nelson · Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Ross · Phænix Life Insurance v. Raddin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But we must remember that the receiver represents all the parties in interest. He stands for the railroad company as "well as for all persons having claims against it, and he speaks for the bondholders as well as for the stockholders.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.