Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 62 F.1d 582 - New York Filter Co. v. O. H. Jewell Filter Co.

New York Filter Co. v. O. H. Jewell Filter Co.’s Empirical Analysis

62 F. 582 · 1894

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
November 1900
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Page v. Holmes Burglar Alarm Telegraph Co. · New York Filter Co. v. O. H. Jewell Filter Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The New Orleans affidavits are, in my opinion, unimportant. The information which they contain is unsubstantial in its character.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.