Porter v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis
62 F. 626 · 1894
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
November 1933
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Covell v. Heyman · Freeman v. Howe · Krippendorf v. Hyde · James L. v. Carryl · Union Nat Bank of Chicago v. Bank of Kansas City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The proceeding of the plaintiff in this-: case, by which he took from the possession of the sheriff the chattels levied on, was ancillary, — not in any way affecting the merits of the original case. That can go on without conflicting with any of the cases quoted above.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oakes v. Lake · Porter v. Davidson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.