Appleton v. Ecaubert’s Empirical Analysis
62 F. 742 · 1894
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 1895
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Morgan v. Daniels · Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone Co. · Butterworth v. United States ex rel. Hoe · Shuter v. Davis · Smith v. Halkyard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In practicing it a matrix die was used, having a design or pattern upon its inner circumference. Into this matrix the watch-case center was placed, and then, by a small pressure roller revolving upon the inner face of the center, the latter was ‘spun’ or expanded outward so as to take the impression from the pattern on the inner circumference of the die, The matrix die was made in parte, so that it could bo removed after the ornamentation was produced.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ecaubert v. Appleton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.