Allen v. Kemp

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 27, 1933.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1933-01-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1961

2 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on Lamson Co. v. Whittemore

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1933-01-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 *1048Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.

¶2Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Applications for leave to appeal denied. An appeal lies from the order of the court allowing or disallowing creditors’ claims. We see no reason for reviewing an: interlocutory order of the court permitting a creditor to contest the claims of other creditors. See, on this general subject, In re Gelino’s Inc. (C. C. A.) 51 F.(2d) 875. The question as to whether or not a creditor who has opposed the allowance of the claims of other creditors can appeal from the order allowing the claim is not involved upon this application.