Rogers v. Hill

Decided Feb. 6, 1933.

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1933

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1933-02-06

¶1See, also, 53 F.(2d) 395.

¶2Richard Reid Rogers, of New York City, plaintiff-appellant, pro se.

¶3Chadboume, Stanchfield & Levy, of New York City (Nathan L. Miller, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

¶4Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Decree affirmed on the authority of Rogers v. Hill, 60 F.(2d) 109 (C. C. A. 2).

¶7AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge

¶8(concurring).

¶9I concur on the authority specified in the per curiam. With the matter open, I should reach a different decision.