Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

62 F.2d 182

Docket No. 6859.

United States v. Baxter

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 14, 1932.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1932-12-14

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1932-12-14

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1961

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

801932194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Samuel W. McNabb, U. S. Atty., and Clyde Thomas and L, M. Andrews, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal. (H. C. Veit, Regional Atty., U. S. Veterans’ Bureau, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for the United States.

¶2David Spaulding, of West Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5There was substantial evidence to be submitted to the jury on the question of permanent and total disability. Direct evidence that the disability was total and permanent was introduced by the appellee. The fact that the appellee worked for considerable periods and was paid small wages therefor is not sufficient to overturn the effect of the evidence as to the character of the appellee’s disabilities. That labor was performed for only a small part of the day each day in a Soldiers’ Home where, of course, it is tha purpose of the authorities to encourage men to do all that they are able to do, and for long periods was not continuous.

¶6Judgment affirmed.

/62/f2d/182 · .json · Public domain